Sap

The documentation page demonstrates a mild Windows bias: Windows/WSFC scenarios and installation steps are consistently listed before Linux equivalents, and Windows-specific clustering tools (WSFC) are mentioned prominently. However, Linux options (SUSE, RHEL, Pacemaker, GlusterFS) are also covered with parity in both infrastructure and installation sections, and links to Linux guides are provided.

• Alternate the order of Windows and Linux sections/examples to avoid always listing Windows first.
• Explicitly state that both Windows and Linux are fully supported and provide a summary table comparing approaches.
• Include references to Linux clustering tools (Pacemaker, Corosync, etc.) in introductory sections, not just as links.
• Ensure that diagrams and figures are balanced between Windows and Linux scenarios.
• Add a section highlighting differences and considerations for Linux users up front.

The documentation presents Windows troubleshooting steps before Linux, and references Windows-specific paths and tools (such as C:\Packages\... and Windows processes) before their Linux equivalents. However, Linux troubleshooting is covered in a dedicated section with parallel information.

• Alternate the order of Windows and Linux sections or merge them to present both platforms equally.
• Provide side-by-side examples for both Windows and Linux where possible.
• Explicitly mention Linux tools/processes when discussing troubleshooting steps, not just as an afterthought.
• Ensure error code solutions reference both Windows and Linux setup scripts or commands.